My First Dutch Examination

Sat for my first examination for the biopsychology of emotions from 7.30pm to 10pm last evening. The paper was to last until 10pm, but quite a few people started to leave at about 8pm. As with all other aspects of university life in the Netherlands, UU examinations are pretty relaxed as compared to the ones I get back at home. To quote an example, my lecturer gave us hints not just on which article to study, but specifically which sections of the article to read. I left the examination hall at 9.30pm after throwing a smoke grenade on the Monk question because it was too vague and difficult. Looks like I may not have to use my smoke grenade after all.

Dear students,
Its seems that I was unclear in lecture 7 when pointing out the important parts of the literature and might therefore been wrong in asking question 1 (Dagleisch) and part b of question 6 (Monk)
Can the students who attended Lecture 7 please tell me how my message on the Dagleish and Monk article was understood. I would like to have as much information as possible because if I was unclear/or wrong in these questions, they will be removed from the exam.
Thanks you and I am sorry for this misunderstanding
****

ARGH! I can't stand it. It is so unlike professors to apologize for giving misleading hints. The ones in NUS do that all the time! *Think Paediatric Psychology......*

UPDATE:
EXAM QUESTIONS 1 AND 6 WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE EXAM BECAUSE I HAVE MISINFORMED YOU ABOUT THE FOCUS OF THE ARTICLES OF DAGLISCH AND MONK. IF STUDENTS HOWEVER WANT ME TO INCLUDE 1 AND 6, BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY ANSWERED CORRECTLY PLEASE LET ME KNOW ASAP. REMEMBER, ONLY IF YOU WANT ME TO INCLUDE QUESTIONS 1 AND 6 LET ME KNOW, FOR THE OTHERS THEY WILL BE EXCLUDED AND THE 25 POINTS WILL COME FROM THE REST OF THE QUESTIONS
I AM AGAIN VERY SORRY, AND WILL TAKE
THE ISSUE ALSO EXTRA INTO ACCOUNT IN MY GRADING
****